Abuse :: essays research papers

The study of interobserver reliability tested the level of agreement among youngster welfare workers on the presence or absence of emotional call and several other forms of neglect and child abuse. Contrary to expectations, soaring levels of accurate identification and agreement was attained. careless(predicate) of the high level of interobserver reliability, the validity of the notion is questioned. Training for the sample used in the study is evidently effective.Interobserver reliability is one of the dominant let gos facing child protective receipts workers. Its importance escalates as the signs of the neglect or abuse become more abstract and less obvious. The main concern of interobserver reliability is if fivefold observers concur on the presence or absence of a particular happening. The level of agreement will be overwhelmingly affected by the hydrofoil of the definitions of abuse and neglect and the extent to which staff are trained in their application. At least one other study raised concerns about this issue because it applies to various aspects of child protective services information processing and definition. A national organization has been formed to fight false accusations called VOCAL (Victims of Child maltreat Laws).In the early phases of the child protective services movement, physical abuse was their main concern. Decades later other types of abuse with unclear indicators have come to prominence, such(prenominal) as emotional abuse and neglect. Emotional abuse and neglect are abstract concepts and provide the basis for concern as to whether child protective service workers can always identify them with given common information, especially when they are among other forms of abuse and neglect. There are problems in defining emotional abuse and neglect, just as there are problems in defining any type of child maltreatment. The definition of child maltreatment should include only ill harmful behaviors and outcomes. Protective policies and systems should be utilized only to enforce societal sanctions, not to enforce ideal standards of care giving.Psychological maltreatment of children and youth consists of acts of remissness and commission, which are judge on the basis of a combination of community standards and professional expertise to be psychologically damaging. Individuals commit such acts, singly or collectively, who by their characteristics (knowledge, status, or organizational form) are in a position of differential power that renders a child s vulnerability. Such acts damage presently or ultimately the behavioral, cognitive, affective, or physical functioning of the child.