Stem Cells Research Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Stem Cells Research - Essay ExampleIn the approach to select some semblance of civility from both opposing camps, many articles have been written both for commonplace readership and for the scientific community. The discourses have been tackled from different angles of argument yet it is still difficult to find middle ground. in that respect are significant differences between a scholarly and favourite publication. Academic publication puzzles to provide the scientific community and academe theoretically based arguments that would capture their attention. Popular publications on the other hand aim to grow the general public on the contentious issues without venturing into technical terminologies that may cloud the issue further. Writers for popular publications should consider the limitations of readers when it comes to explaining relevant facts. The academic and scientific community would non accept simple explanations for the issues. They would consider the severity of the arguments if they were well grounded and anchored on accepted theories. Both mediums aim to in degree but they carry different weights. In examining some examples of the two types of publications, it is but appropriate to consider the audience each of the publications was intended for. Ultimately, the intention of the writers is to educate the public.At first glance, without delving into details, academic pub... If one would require fast facts, then it is more practical to deform to popular publications. The strategy of this paper is to pair up two articles from each type with similar issues discussed. This would slip by the readers two presentations for the same issue. The Regulation ArgumentPopular Publication Article Title To create, or not to createAuthor Bernadine Healy, M.D.Publication U.S. News & World Report. WashingtonAcademic Publication Article Navigating the slack water the regulation of human embryonic stem stall researchAuthor/s D.G.Jones and C.R.TownsPublication humane ReproductionDr. Healy, writing on the necessity of having ground rules set before pursuing stem cell research further, attempted to influence her readers through her more emotional contentions about the issue. There was no attempt to elaborate on details. The writer dealt with simple facts that the public can easily relate and understand. She did give a brief background on the progress of legislation but very little detail. Healy presented one agency on banning the continuance of stem cell research. She wrote, A Swiss law that took effect earliest this month is typical of laws in most European countries It bans embryo creation outright.1Jones and Towns elaborated on four different positions. attitude A advocated complete ban of stem cell research Position B called for status quo Position C allowed continued research within the 14-day limit for embryo fall and Position D permitted the creation of human embryo for research purposes in addition to the other menses research initiatives.2Comparing the intentions of the two articles, both are informative but the writers of the scholarly publication allowed the readers to form their opinions after having